Why can a business lawfully send unsolicityed traditional mail, or make unsolicited phone calls but spamming violates the law? 1. The trial court found that Stengart did not have a legitimate expectation of privacy when sending personal emails through the company’s laptop. The appellate court and the Supreme Court disagreed. Discuss the reasoning that the higher courts had in reversing the trial court. 2. What effect would this decision have on a company when thinking about forming company policy regarding personal communication? 3. Would a state antispam statute that specifically prohibited pornographic, obscene, terroristic, and fraudulent emailing withstand constitutional scrutiny? Why or why not? 4. Is spam really so bad? Why can a business lawfully send unsolicityed traditional mail, or make unsolicited phone calls but spamming violates the law?
GET AN ANSWER TO THIS ESSAY TODAY!
Save time and grade. Get a complete paper today.
Our leading custom writing service provides custom written papers in 80+ disciplines. Order essays, research papers, term papers, book reviews, assignments, dissertation, thesis or extensive dissertations & our expert ENL writers will easily prepare a paper according to your requirements.
Place this order today and get an amazing discount!!